(ISC)² Twitter Updates

  • (ISC)² Twitter Updates

    About the
    (ISC)² Blog

    • (ISC)² believes in the importance of open dialogue and collaboration, between both (ISC)², its certified members and members of business and society.

      (ISC)² established this blog to provide a voice to its certified members, who have significant knowledge and valuable insights to share that can benefit the information security industry, the people in it and the public at large.

      The postings on this site are the author's own and don't necessarily represent
      (ISC)²'s positions, strategies or opinions. (ISC)² does not control, monitor, or endorse any links provided in this blog and makes no warranty or statement regarding the content on any linked website.

      Those who post comments to blogs should ensure their comments are focused on the topic at hand. (ISC)² reserves the right to remove any post or comment from this site.

      Should you find objectionable content in this blog, please notify us as soon as possible at blog@isc2.org.

      Please click here for FAQs.

      Please click here for the Blog guidelines.

    « Funding security awareness programs | Main | Prioritizing Security »

    23 September 2008

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f109b678834010534c10a92970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Password Reset Services Can Weaken Authentication:

    Comments

    Hi Sean,

    Creative answers to authentication questions is excellent advice. Thanks!

    Yours sincerely, Tim

    The organization must buy off on the reason for 'hard questions' and be prepared to educate the end user on why it has chosen to do so. Otherwise the value is lost and adoption sinks.

    I would take it a step further. I would combine with numbers and special characters like a password.

    Another lesson from the Sarah Palin Yahoo hack is that the laws covering privacy needs to be modernized. If the same hacker stole her postal mail rather than her e-mail, he or she would get 5 years in prison rather than 2 years. However, a first time offender would probably see no prison time. On top of it, the web site which published the web site has not technically violated any laws. There should be a law against such publication since it aiding and abetting the crime. Suppose it was her financial information? She could have been subject to a huge finanical losses (I don't care what her politics is, she has a right to privacy.) in addition, this publication could have lead to physical security problems by tipping off her future activities.

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    Recent Contributors

    Past Contributors